Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Coryell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1893No. 16,303PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, C. J.

This was an action in the Jackson Circuit Court by the appellants against the appellees, for the partition of the lands described in the complaint.

The appellants are the children of Hiram Marling, Sr., who died seized of the land, and the appellees are his grandchildren.

The only controverted question in the case relates to an alleged advancement made by the said Hiram Marling, Sr., to the father of the appellees. Upon the issue involving this question the court found for the appellees. The assignment of error calls in question the propriety of the ruling of the circuit court in denying the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Graham v. PayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Schnurr v. StultsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Cobler, Admr. v. Prudential Life Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Zimmerman v. WeigelIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Brittenham v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Schick v. BlakesleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API