Schnurr v. Stults
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, C. J. —
The appellant claimed in the court below a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. An issue of fact was made by counter-affidavits, and upon this issue the appellant failed. So far as the affidavits and counter-affidavits properly presented an issue of fact, the decision of the trial court is binding upon us, as it is well supported.
If, however, the affidavits of the appellant only are to be considered, they do not entitle him to a new trial, for there is not such diligence shown as the law requires. One who-asks a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Allen v. BondIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Lefever v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Fox v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Conrad v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Rosenberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
- Gates v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.