Legal Opinion
State v. One 1976 Chevrolet Van
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 25, 1989No. 7399PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant, Timothy Rickards,1 is the owner of a 1976 Chevrolet van that was the subject of an in rem proceeding by the state pursuant to General Statutes § 54-33g.2 He appeals from the trial court’s judgment ordering forfeiture of the vehicle.
The following facts are not in dispute. On March 4, 1988, the defendant was arrested without a warrant during an undercover drug investigation in Old Saybrook and charged with possession with intent to sell marihuana in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 and conspiracy to sell marihuana in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-277 (b) and 53a-48…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- State v. ParmaleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Loulis v. ParrottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- In re Shonna K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Blau v. State Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- In re Dexter P.Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.