Legal Opinion

City of Aurora v. Patrick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1980No. 79-248PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

R. C. 2945.71(B), in pertinent part, provides:

“A person against whom a charge of misdemeanor, other than a minor misdemeanor, is pending in a court of record, shall be brought to trial:

t( * * *

“(2) Within ninety days after his arrest or the service of summons, if the offense charged is a misdemeanor of the first or second degree* * *.”

R. C. 2945.72 provides, in part:

“The time within which an accused must be brought to trial, * * *may be extended only by the following:

<< * * *

“(H)***the period of any reasonable continuance granted other than upon the accused’s own motion.”

This court has held…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LeeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. PudlockOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. McRaeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. WentworthOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of Aurora v. KepleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. MincyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API