Legal Opinion
State v. Lee
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1976No. 76-28PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.
The General Assembly, in enacting R. C. 2945.72, recognized that strict time limits.for trials cannot be imposed in all circumstances as some, degree of flexibility is necessary. That statute provides- for certain extensions, and reads in pertinent part: ;
“The time within which an accused must be brought to trial * * * may be extended only by the following:..; ((***:
“(H) The period of any continuance granted-on'the accused’s owp. motion, and the period of any reasonable continuance granted other than upon the accused's,.own-motion.” . (‘ í; v-V *’ ‘
It is evident that to construe R. C. 2945.72…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PudlockOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CrossOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by124 opinions
- State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MincyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 2002
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.