Legal Opinion

State v. Wentworth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1978No. 77-788PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStepheNSON, J.

Appellant asserts he was entitled to discharge upon his motion made at commencement of trial by reason of the failure of the state to try him within the 90-day period set forth in R. C. 2945.71(B)(2).2 The pivot*173al issue thus presented is whether the trial court’s, order, although entered within the 90-day period prescribed in R. C. 2945.71(B), continuing the case for trial to a date,six months after the pre-trial, and 196 days after arrest, .and doing so by utilizing a form entry giving the reason for continuance as a • crowded docket, without further explication in the. record, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. MacDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. LeeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. PudlockOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. City of Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API