Legal Opinion

People v. Frigerio

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1895No. 21193PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

Appellant and one Josefa Balletto were jointly charged, under section 332 of the Penal Code, with a felony committed by obtaining the sum of three hundred dollars from one T. Marinovich, by trick and device, by the use of cards.

Defendant was tried separately, and was convicted and sentenced to the state prison. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial and an order refusing to arrest the judgment.

Several grounds of error are urged, but we do not regard any of them as possessing merit.

1. The information was in substantial compliance with the requirements of the…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API