Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co. v. Town of Sanford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
The appeal presents the single question whether the facts of the instant ease bring it within the principle announced in Thompson v. Lumberton, 182 N. C., 260, 108 S. E., 722, or the exception to the general rule as applied in Advertising Co. v. Asheville, 189 N. C., 737, 128 S. E., 149. We have concluded that the case is controlled by the decisions in Thompson v. Lumberton, supra, Turner v. New Bern, 187 N. C., 541, 122 S. E., 469, Paul v. Washington, 134 N. C., 363, 47 S. E., 793, Rosenbaum v. New Bern, 118 N. C., 83, 24 S. E., 1, and others of like import.
The general rule is,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Turner v. . New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Wardens St. Peter's Episcopal Church v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Paul v. WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Thompson v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Dixie Poster Advertising Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Roller v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Cedar Creek Enterprises, Inc. v. State of North Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Clinard v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Davis v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.