United States v. Exxon Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The government (“DOE”) initiated this suit to recoup overcharges in the sale of oil allegedly caused by Exxon as the operator of the Hawkins Field Unit. In August, 1980, Exxon filed this motion to dismiss, arguing that working interest and royalty owners of various tracts in the Field Unit are indispensable parties under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the court cannot obtain personal jurisdiction over most of these interest owners, Exxon maintains, the suit should be dismissed in toto, or, at a minimum, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sauder v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bloch v. Sun Oil CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971
- Tenneco Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Ramsey v. Bomin Testing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
- First National Montana Bank of Missoula v. Federal Leasing, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1986