Legal Opinion
First National Montana Bank of Missoula v. Federal Leasing, Inc.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided July 1, 1986No. CV 84-180-M-CCLPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOVELL, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party pursuant to Rule 19, Fed.R.Civ.P.
Plaintiff commenced this action in September, 1984, seeking damages for breach of an agreement for sale of the right to receive payments from a certain lease between the United States Navy and Amperif Corporation. Originally named as defendants were Federal Leasing, Inc., (hereafter also “Leasing”) and Amperif Corporation. On October 11, 1985, this Court entered an order dismissing the complaint as to Amperif…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Ferdinand Henry Schutten v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- William M. Haas v. Jefferson National Bank of Miami Beach, and Charles H. Glueck, New PartyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Ofelia Bakia and Mihai Bakia, as the Parents of Santiago Bakia, Per ca.c.c.p. § 376 v. County of Los Angeles of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.