Legal Opinion
United States v. Exxon Corp.
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 1985No. Nos. DC-91 to DC-100PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY E. BROWN, Judge.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
These appeals arise from an action filed in the District of Columbia by the United States against the defendant-appellant, Exxon Corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Sections 208(b), 209, of the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, 12 U.S.C.A. Section 1904 note.1 (Hereafter, ESA)
The United States sought civil penalties and restitution from Exxon for overcharges which occurred in an unitized field known as the “Hawkins Field Unit,” (HFU) located near Tyler, Texas. It was claimed that the overcharges resulted from miscalculations of “old” and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McCallum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cities Service Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sauder v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Jarvis Christian College v. Exxon Corporation, Ivey Hugh Rutherford v. Exxon Corporation, C.M. Beckett, Jr. v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Kern Oil & Refining Co., Plaintiff/counter-Defendant/appellee v. Tenneco Oil Company, Defendant/counter-Claimant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Conoco Inc. (Formerly Continental Oil Co.) v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. HerringtonTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1987
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.