Bloch v. Sun Oil Corporation
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Under oil and gas leases covering mineral interests owned by Plaintiffs, Defendants have been for many years producing and selling natural gas. This natural gas is not pure but contains certain by-products which Defendants have extracted and sold separately from the gas. Some of these by-products Plaintiffs allege have great value on which Defendants have failed to pay royalties pursuant to the provisions of their leases. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the leases entitle them to royalties on the value of the by-products and judgments based on an accounting…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hall Jones Oil Corporation v. ClaroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Gallaspy v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Joseph H. Beaman v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Envirotech Corporation and Chemico Air Pollution Control Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and Envirotech Corporation, on Counterclaim-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Mrs. Edna Romero Doty v. St. Mary Parish Land CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Francis Oil & Gas, Inc., Appellant-Plaintiff v. Exxon Corporation, Appellee-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Whyham v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Gottlieb v. VaicekDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.