Legal Opinion

Schumpert v. Tishman Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1988No. B026932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

198 Cal.App.3d 598 (1988)

243 Cal. Rptr. 810

WILLIAM EDWARD SCHUMPERT, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

TISHMAN COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. B026932.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

February 11, 1988.

COUNSEL

John H. Mitchell for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Smylie & Selman and John C. Wallace for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

COMPTON, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff William Schumpert appeals from an order of dismissal entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583.420, subdivision (a)(1)[1] for failure to serve defendants within two years of commencing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Danielson v. ITT Industrial Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Dubois v. Corroon & Black Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Ladd v. Dart Equipment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Williams v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Wong v. DavidianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API