DeLuna v. St. Elizabeth's Hospital
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Miller
The present appeals concern the constitutionality of section 2 — 622 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 622). Under that provision, an attorney representing a plaintiff in a healing art malpractice action, or the plaintiff himself, if proceeding pro se, must attach to the complaint both an affidavit declaring that the attorney or pro se plaintiff has consulted with a health professional who believes that there is merit to the action, and the report of the professional stating the basis for that determination. Submission of those documents may in certain…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Sullivan v. Edward HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Kunkel v. WaltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.