Car Advertising Co. v. New York City Car Advertising Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegebich, J.
The plaintiff seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendant from using the name “ New York City Car Advertising Company.” The facts are as follows: From 1891 until the summer of 1901 Henry Wineburgh, Jesse Wineburgh and Abraham Wineburgh, brothers, were the owners of the Railway Advertising Company, a corporation, and were engaged in the business of advertising in cars. Some time in 1900 or 1901 differences arose between Henry on the one hand and the other two on *106the other hand, and the former withdrew and organized the plaintiff corporation under the laws of the State of New…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koehler v. . SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hygeia Water Ice Co. v. New York Hygeia Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. of KansasNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Day v. WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- Title & Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. Louisiana Abstract & Title Guarantee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Brown & Bigelow v. Remembrance Advertising Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1951