Legal Opinion
Brown & Bigelow v. Remembrance Advertising Products, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Isidor Wasservogel, Off. Ref.
This is an action for unfair competition wherein plaintiff seeks to enjoin and restrain defendants from using the words ‘ ‘ Remembrance Advertising ’ ’ and *158“ Bemembrance ” as part of defendant’s corporate name, “ Bemembrance Advertising Products, Inc.”
Plaintiff, a foreign corporation, with principal offices in St. Paul, Minnesota, has used the words “ Bemembrance ” and “ Bemembrance Advertising ” as its trade-mark for more than 25 years. Plaintiff is engaged in the business of advertising the products of other concerns and individuals by the sale of calendars,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Best & Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Neva-Wet Corp. of America, Inc. v. Never Wet Processing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Federal Television Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Kaufman & Ruderman, Inc. v. Cohn & RosenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Avon Periodicals, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
- Ball v. United Artists Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961