Legal Opinion

Hollifield v. Everhart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1953No. 96PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNB, J.

The challenge to the ruling of the court below in sustaining the demurrer filed, as set forth above, presents the question as to whether or not the facts alleged in the complaint of plaintiff are sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the demurrants on actionable negligence.

For this purpose the truth of the allegations contained in the complaint is admitted, and “ordinarily relevant inferences of fact necessarily deducible therefrom are also admitted. But the principle does not extend to admissions of conclusions or inferences of law.” Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N.C. 511, 142 S.E.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. MayberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Potter v. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Troxler v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Pressly v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Smith v. GrubbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API