Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bk., Lyndhurst v. Bianchi Smith

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage made by the defendant company to the complainant. After the bill was filed a receiver was appointed for the defendant company in insolvency proceedings. The receiver was made a party to this suit and defends on the ground that the mortgage is void as against creditors under the provisions of section 64 of the Corporation act. 2 Comp. Stat. p. 1638. It is undisputed that the consideration for the mortgage in question was an antecedent debt. Antecedent debts do not constitute a valuable consideration within the meaning of this section of the Corporation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. John Agnew Co. v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
  2. Horton v. BamfordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  3. Turp v. DickinsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Empire State Trust Co. v. Trustees of William F. Fisher & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  5. Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schafer Ball Bearings Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Madsen v. Burns Bros.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. Mustanen v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Stein v. George B. Spearin, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. In re J. Rosen & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Smith v. Commercial Credit Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API