Legal Opinion

Stein v. George B. Spearin, Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 25, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By consent of counsel, two separate actions brought by complainant, one against George B. Spearin, Incorporated, et al., and the other against F.H. McGraw Company et al. (hereinafter referred to as Spearin and McGraw, respectively), involving similar facts, were heard and tried together; the relief sought in each being a decree setting aside the assignment therein challenged and adjudging the moneys paid and/or received thereunder to be due and owing to complainant as receiver of Terminal Warehouses, Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as Terminal).

Without dispute, the testimony discloses…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Schantz v. . OakmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Getty v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wittner v. MetzgerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Silverstein v. LastNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. J. Leo Johnson, Inc. v. CarmerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  4. Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  5. J. Leo Johnson, Inc. v. CarmerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API