Legal Opinion

John Agnew Co. v. Board of Education

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 13, 1914PublishedCited by 52 opinions

On final tearing on bills, answers, replications and proofs taken in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, Y. C.

1. The decree will adjudge that any liens originally acquired by the Ingalls Stone Company and James Healey, by the filing of their respective notices, were released so that they have no participation in the'distribution of the fund. Under the statute, as amended in 1909, these parties are covered by a bond securing their entire claims. The provision for the substitution of a bond for the claimant’s lien, which was injected into the statute in 1909, like many other provisions of the act, is badly drawn. After a careful study of this amendment, I have reached the conclusion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Lansco, Inc v. Dept. of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Menendez v. Saks And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Kenin's Trust Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Jardine Estates, Inc. v. Donna Brook Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API