Legal Opinion

Oakland County Drain Com'r v. City of Royal Oak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1949No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 44,318PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Earl L. Clark, county drain commissioner for the county of Oakland, Michigan, plaintiff, filed a petition for declaration of rights naming as defendants various cities and townships and individual landowners within the Royal Oak drain district in the county of Oakland, the county itself, the State highway commissioner, the State land office board, and holders of the drain district’s bonds. There being a large number of landowner-taxpayers and bondholders interested, the individual defendants were designated as representing the class to which they belong as well as themselves. In order to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Keefe v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Breiholz v. Board of Supervisors of Pocahontas Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Municipal Investors Ass'n v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Keefe v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ahearn v. Bloomfield Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Dixon Road Group v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Foren v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hawley v. City of Hot SpringsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API