Legal Opinion

Foren v. City of Royal Oak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Docket 60-62, Calendar 46,448-46,450PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Defendants appeal in each of the 3 combined cases from decree adjudging void a special assessment levied against plaintiffs’ properties for proposed construction of curb and pavement and enjoining such construction and collection of the tax.

The street to be improved is that portion of Orchard View drive extending west for approximately 2,500 feet from its intersection with an improved street known as Main. Plaintiffs Foren and Boyd own, respectively, large corner plots on either side of Orchard View drive immediately west of and fronting on Main. Plaintiffs Barry own large plots on both sides…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Powers v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Oakland County Drain Com'r v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Petz v. GainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Auditor General v. KonwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Kadzban v. City of GrandvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Dixon Road Group v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Nebco, Inc. v. SpeedlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rowley v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API