Legal Opinion
Hawley v. City of Hot Springs
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1979No. 12038PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Justice (on reassignment).
This action arises from the imposition of a special assessment for sewer improvements by the city of Hot Springs. Respondents’ property involved in the assessment consisted of six lots abutting Highway No. 385 upon which were situated a house and a five-unit motel structure.1
The assessment of the costs of the sewer system in this situation is controlled by SDCL 9-48-43, which provides:
The total benefit of a main or trunk sewer constructed under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed to be not less than the total cost thereof, including the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Soo Line Railroad Company v. City of WiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Meyer v. City of Oakland ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Goodell v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Foren v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hubbard v. CITY OF PIERRESouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Dixon Road Group v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Simmons v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Brookings v. Associated Developers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Hawley v. City of Hot SpringsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.