Legal Opinion
Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General Motors
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1982No. TC A7707-10270, CA 15458, SC 27927 & 27905Published
1Opinion of the Court
642 P.2d 624 (1982)
56 Or.App. 590
Mildred SANDFORD, Petitioner On Review,
v.
CHEVROLET DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS AND FRIENDLY CHEVROLET COMPANY, a Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc., a Corporation and the Tire Factory, an Oregon Corporation, Respondents On Review.
TC A7707-10270; CA 15458; SC 27927 & 27905.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted November 4, 1981.
Decided March 16, 1982.
Rehearing Denied May 4, 1982.
Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition for review was Dan O'Leary, Portland, John S. Stone, and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, Kahn &…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- General Motors Corp. v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.