Ramsdell v. Ramsdell
Washington Supreme Court
• Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Snell, J., entered March 28, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for divorce.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of divorce, and the cause comes before us on the complaint and the findings made by the trial court. The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on several grounds, but we find no merit in the motion. The appellant had a lawful right to appeal on the judgment roll and question the sufficiency of the complaint and findings to support the judgment against him. The motion to dismiss is therefore denied.
Two errors are assigned: First, that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or show that the court below had jurisdiction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Webster v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- McLennan v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Fields v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Luce v. LuceWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Miller v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carnahan v. CarnahanArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Faulkner v. FaulknerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Shively v. ShivelyOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- McCallum v. McCallumWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Cotter v. CotterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.