Cotter v. Cotter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtWolverton, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). In support of the demurrer, the defendant in error insists that the complaint is defective in that it does not show that the superior courts of the state of Washington have jurisdiction to grant divorces.
Formerly in England the ecclesiastical courts possessed exclusive jurisdiction over matrimonial causes, and such was the case at the time of the adoption of the American Constitution. Ecclesiastical courts have not been established in this country, and when it is said that the colonies and the states of the Union adopted the common law of England, it is not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lynde v. Lynde; Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Beers v. BeersWashington Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Levine v. LevineOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Holton v. HoltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Loomis v. LoomisWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- McIntire v. McIntireSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Brown v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.