Kamp v. Curtis

Four issues are presented on this appeal: (1) Did the trial court commit prejudicial error by refusing to find and instruct the jury that the plaintiff Kamp was negligent by law as to speed;(2) Did the plaintiff’s expert base his answer to a hypothetical question on facts not in evidence; and, if so, were defendants Curtis and his insurer so prejudiced as to require a new trial;(3) Did the trial court err in not changing the jury’s finding that defendant Curtis was an employee of Ford, Bacon & Davis at the time of the accident; and(4) Did the trial court err in changing the jury’s finding…