Legal Opinion

DeRuyter v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 27, 1996No. 94-1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

In this case we reaffirm the inveterate rule of law in Wisconsin that an employee is acting within the scope of his or her employment while driving to or from work only if the employer exercises control over the method or route of the employee's travel. Consequently, we reject the trial court's ruling, which held as a matter of law that Wisconsin Electric Power Company was vicariously liable for the allegedly negligent actions of its employee, Michael T. Schmal-ing, while he drove from his home to a vocational training session held at Wisconsin Electric's central training center. The trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Olsen v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Mentek v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ewald v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  2. Marilyn M. Brown v. Acuity, A Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Estate of Murray v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Milwaukee Transport Services., Inc. v. Family Dollar Stores of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  5. Brown v. AcuityCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API