Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heitmuller v. Berkow

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 6, 1948No. 9490Published

1DissentClark, Associate Justice

I am in absolute agreement with the majority opinion that the statute involved here does not limit attorneys’ fees in cases arising under the statute to services rendered in the Municipal Court. I believe it is nothing more than the exercise of common sense reasoning to conclude that the statute contemplates compensation for attorneys where the statutory action is carried into the appellate courts. But I cannot agree with the further conclusion which negatives authority in the appellate courts to make the award of attorneys’ fees for the appellate proceedings.

It is my opinion that circuity of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rigopoulos v. KervanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Dumas v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  3. Diomede v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. American Can Co. v. Ladoga Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  5. Greenberg v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API