Legal Opinion

Rogers v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from Allen, J., at January Term, 1916, of Duplipt.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbis is an action to set aside a deed under wbicb tbe defendants claim on tbe ground tbat it bad never been delivered, tbe lack of-.sufficient mental capacity from tbe grantor to execute tbe same, and undue influence. Tbe jury found all three issues in favor of tbe defendants. Tbe trial seems to have hinged, however, almost solely upon the question whether there had been a sufficient delivery.

The assignments of error, except 6, 7, 8, and 9, are totally insufficient and must be disregarded. The first assignment is: “1. To the question and answer in the admission of the evidence of the witness…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fortune v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Thompson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Porter v. American Cigar Box Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. McDowell v. J. S. Kent Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Lynch v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Chamberlain Etl Al. v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Pamlico County v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. State v. DishmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API