Legal Opinion

State v. Dishman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1959No. 145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

From time to time for more than 50 years, the Court has stated the minimum requirements for valid assignments of error. “Just what will constitute a sufficiently specific assignment must depend very largely upon the special circumstances of the particular case; but always the very error relied upon should be definitely and clearly presented, and the Oourt not compelled to go beyond the assignment itself to learn what the question is. The assignment must be so specific that the Court is given some real aid and a voyage of discovery through an often voluminous record not rendered necessary.” *761Tho…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. . LivingstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . StefanoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Thompson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. DouglasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API