Legal Opinion
Farrell v. Pike
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided November 16, 2004No. 1:03 CCV 01055PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BEATY, District Judge.
On October 14, 2004, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss (docket no. 15) be, and the same hereby is, denied.
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIASON
ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fegley v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Reich v. Gateway Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. Institute for Family Centered Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Lamonica v. Safe Hurricane Shutters, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Lester v. TMG, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Higgs v. Brian Ctr. Health & Retirement/Windsor, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Forsythe v. First Financial Investment Fund Holdings, LLC (TV2)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.