Legal Opinion
Pacific Diamond Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1978No. Civ. 43602PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINBERG, J.
This case comes before us on a petition for a writ of mandate brought by the plaintiff in the court below. The Supreme Court granted an alternative writ and then transferred the cause to this court.
The facts, for purposes of this writ, were stipulated to at the trial court. They are as follows:
Torczyner is the president and sole shareholder of Pacific Diamond Company, Inc., (petitioner) a California corporation engaged in the sale, at wholesale, of diamonds. Torczyner travels throughout the United States as a salesman of diamonds, which diamonds he carries with him. On…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hernandez v. BurgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Cable v. Sahara Tahoe Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hisako Nagashima v. Hyatt Wilshire Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Bean v. Travelair Ins. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992