Legal Opinion

Hisako Nagashima v. Hyatt Wilshire Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1991No. B046885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant, alleging she suffered personal injuries and loss of property when personal property was stolen from her while she was a guest at a hotel owned and operated by defendant. Following settlement of plaintiff’s personal injury claim, a court trial was held on her claim for loss of personal property. Stipulating to the underlying facts, the parties asked the court to resolve the legal issue “of the application of the California ‘Innkeeper Statute’ as set forth at Civil Code Sections 1859 and I860.” The court, holding inapplicable the limitation on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gardner v. Jonathan ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Federal Insurance v. Beverly Hills Hotel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Pacific Diamond Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Forte Hotels InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Stephen Duvall and Betty Duvall v. The Ritz Carlton Hotel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API