Legal Opinion
Nottingham Partners v. Dana
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided August 29, 1989PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Chancery, in and for New Castle County, approving an Agreement of Compromise and Settlement (“Settlement”) in Dana v. Trans-Lux Corp. (the “Dana action”). The plaintiff-appellee, George W. Dana (“Dana”), filed an individual, class and derivative action on March 23, 1988. Dana’s complaint against the defendant-ap-pellee, Trans-Lux Corporation and the individual director defendants (collectively “Trans-Lux”), challenged, inter alia, a recapitalization plan to create a supervoting Class B Stock with a subsequent exchange-offer (the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Barkan v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Goodrich v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,923 Nottingham Partners v. Trans-Lux CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- White v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.