Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Young

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1942No. 8861PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

Two questions are presented by this appeal:(1) Whether a stockholder objecting to the compromise of a corporate cause of action in a derivative suit brought by other stockholders is entitled to participate in the action without being joined as a party plaintiff and has the right to introduce evidence in support of his objections; and(2) Whether in a class action approval by the court upon the sole ground that it is recommended by reputable attorneys of a compromise agreed upon by all parties of record, one stockholder objecting, is an exercise of sound judicial discretion.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. The Styria, Scopinich v. MunroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Felton v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  5. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,547 Arthur Newman v. Howard M. Stein, and Morrie Benson and Rose Lerman, Objectants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. James Edward Kennedy v. Harold J. Cardwell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Mabel FLINN, Et Al., Appellants, v. FMC CORPORATION and Local 9 Textile Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  4. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Valley Bank of Nevada v. GinsburgNevada Supreme Court · 1994

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API