Legal Opinion
Sequoia Orange Co. v. Clayton Yeutter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1992No. 91-15241PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
The Secretary of Agriculture appeals the district court’s decision to invalidate amendments to a marketing order because the Secretary did not comply with the Administrative Procedure Act. We affirm.
FACTS
Under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act (“AMAA”) the Secretary of Agriculture has authority to implement marketing orders regulating the sale and delivery of certain agricultural products. 7 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. Since 1954 the Secretary has enforced marketing orders for the sale of Valencia oranges (and navel oranges) in Arizona and California. Part of the order…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- American Hospital Association v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, H.H.S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Miriam Rodway v. The United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Iowa League of Cities v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Association of American Railroads v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Voss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Charles M. McCarthy Jr. v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Coalition for Parity, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.