Voss v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DIBIASO, Acting P. J.
We hold that section 14 of the Food and Agricultural Code expressly exempts the issuance of marketing orders under the California Marketing Act of 1937 (Food & Agr. Code, § 58601 et seq.) from all of the requirements of the California Administrative Procedure Act (Gov. Code, § 11346 et seq.).
Facts and Procedural History
In 1993, a group of plum growers and handlers calling themselves the “Stone Fruit Coalition” approached the California Department of Agriculture (Department), provided it with a proposed mandatory California plum marketing order, and requested that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Reilly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Western States Petroleum etc. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.