Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Frank
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 13, 1992No. Civ. 91-0095PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to amend her Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is denied.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 7, 1991, Plaintiff Dorothy Thomas filed a Complaint alleging that the Defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, on the basis of gender, religion and retaliation. Plaintiff amended her Complaint on January 21, 1991 to include the disposition of pending administrative claims. The Defendant filed an Answer to the Complaint on March 18, 1991 and an Answer to the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bermingham v. Sony Corp. of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Crumley v. Delaware State CollegeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Smith v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Blanding v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Waters v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.