Legal Opinion
Crumley v. Delaware State College
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 11, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-429MMS, 90-711MMS, 91-89MMS, 92-25MMSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is whether the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub.L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071 [hereinafter the “Act” or the “1991 Act”] applies retroactively to three separate pending cases. 1 On May 28, 1992, the Court heard consolidated oral arguments on this issue. For the reasons set forth below, the Court con- eludes: (1) plaintiffs are not entitled to retroactive application of section 102 permitting compensatory and punitive damages and a jury trial; (2) the above conclusions apply to cases involving conduct occurring prior to…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bermingham v. Sony Corp. of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Revis v. Slocomb Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Mass v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Blanding v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Smith v. Zeneca Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.