Legal Opinion
Smith v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 22, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-B-752PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
I. Background
Plaintiff Hieu Smith (Smith) moves to amend her third amended complaint to conform to the 1991 Civil Rights Act (Pub.L. 102-166, Nov. 21, 1991, 105 Stat. 1071) (the Act) and for reconsideration of two March 16, 1992 magistrate judge orders. At oral argument Smith withdrew her motion to reconsider the magistrate judge’s order denying her motion to compel and, thus, I consider only her motion to reconsider the order compelling her to answer Colorado Interstate Gas (CIG)’s discovery requests. Also, CIG moves for partial summary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- AviComm, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Mass v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- People v. McCreadieSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Kotla v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.