Legal Opinion

Waters v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 14, 2001No. CIV A 98-5794 WHWPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

WALLS, District Judge.

Defendants Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane S.p.A. (“Alitalia”), Continental Airlines (“Continental”), Josephine Tyburski (“Ty-burski”), and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“PATH”) (collectively, “defendants”) move for summary judgment on all counts of the First Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 78, this motion is decided without oral argument and is granted. 1

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff John J. Waters (“Waters”) seeks to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained in connection with his transportation aboard Alitalia Flight 611 from…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marsh v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Kellie Stokes v. Southwest AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. King v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. King v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Dasrath v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API