S. B. Beach Properties v. Berti
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is subject to a special motion to strike (anti-SLAPP motion), under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (anti-SLAPP statute). A defendant who is the “prevailing [party] on” such a motion is “entitled to recover his or her attorney’s fees and costs.” (§ 425.16, subd. (c).) Here, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their entire action without prejudice before defendants attempted to file an anti-SLAPP motion. As a result, we conclude that defendants may not recover their attorney fees and costs pursuant to section…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Kyle v. CarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Hong Liu v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Christian Research Institute v. AlnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Club Members for an Honest Election v. Sierra ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. ZambiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Gogri v. Jack in the Box Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.