Legal Opinion

S. B. Beach Properties v. Berti

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2006No. S127513PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is subject to a special motion to strike (anti-SLAPP motion), under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (anti-SLAPP statute). A defendant who is the “prevailing [party] on” such a motion is “entitled to recover his or her attorney’s fees and costs.” (§ 425.16, subd. (c).) Here, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their entire action without prejudice before defendants attempted to file an anti-SLAPP motion. As a result, we conclude that defendants may not recover their attorney fees and costs pursuant to section…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kyle v. CarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Hong Liu v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Christian Research Institute v. AlnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Club Members for an Honest Election v. Sierra ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. ZambiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Gogri v. Jack in the Box Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API