Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Waldron & Goddess
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1984PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
This proceeding arose from a dispute over commissions between two real estate brokers, Waldron and Goddess, in the employ of the same New York real estate concern, Cross and Brown. Waldron seeks a vacatur of Goddess’s demand for arbitration which was predicated upon similar arbitration agreements in their separate employment contracts. Waldron’s contract was in effect at all relevant times, but Goddess’s contract expired prior to the dispute and, although her employment continued, she rejected her employer’s offer to enter into a new written contract. Thus, at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Matter of Lehman v. OstrovskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Schubtex, Inc. v. Allen Snyder, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- God's Battalion of Prayer Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Miele AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Basis Yield Alpha Fund v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.