State v. Trexler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the majority of the panel in the Court of Appeals correctly determined that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss on the basis that the State had failed to prove the corpus delicti of the charged offense. The majority felt that it was bound by this Court’s decision in State v. Brown, 308 N.C. 181, 301 S.E. 2d 89 (1983).
There is some question in the present case as to whether defendant’s extrajudicial statements should be categorized as a con fession or an admission. An admission is a statement…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. Al-BayyinahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.