Legal Opinion

Beeson Brothers v. Chambers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1930No. 22107. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The amended complaint in this case, which will be referred to as the complaint, states three causes of action. The first was for the amount claimed to be unpaid for lumber hauled; the second for merchandise furnished and freight and bridge material hauled; and the third was for damages for loss of profits alleged to have been the result of a breach of a contract by the defendants. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff upon the first two causes of action in the sum of $1,104.09, and $3,908.47 upon the third cause of action. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Skagit Railway & Lumber Co. v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bogart v. Pitchless Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Florence Fish Co. v. Everett Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wallin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kelley v. CohenWashington Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Larson v. Union Investment & Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hole v. Unity Petroleum Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Castleman v. SchiffnerWashington Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API