Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2002No. 71485-1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

A plaintiff in a negligent parole supervision action must prove the inadequate supervision proximately caused the complained-of injuries.

Here Barbara Bell, abducted and raped by a sex offender on parole, sued the State of Washington for failing to use reasonable care to supervise the parolee. The jury found the State breached its duty to reasonably supervise but also found that breach was not a proximate cause of the injury. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We accepted review to consider whether the trial court erred when it (1) refused Bell’s proposed jury instructions on the standard of proof…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Joyce v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Joyce v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Barrett v. Lucky Seven Saloon, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API