Legal Opinion

Castleman v. Schiffner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1931No. 22379. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Oastleman, commenced this action in the superior court for Grant county seeking recovery of damages claimed as the result of alleged false and fraudulent representations made to him by the defendant, Schiffner, inducing him to purchase from Schiffner a hand of sheep. A trial upon the merits in that court, sitting with a jury, resulted in verdict and judgment awarding to Castleman recovery . against Schiffner, from which Schiffner has appealed to this court.

On October 21, 1927, Schiffner was the owner of a band of sheep in Grant county. On that day, a contract in writing was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DoonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wallin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kelley v. CohenWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. IlomakiWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Beeson Brothers v. ChambersWashington Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. WhalonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. LindenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API