Center for Environmental Law & Policy v. Department of Ecology
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
¶ 1 The Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) affirmed the Department of Ecology’s issuance of a report of examination (ROE), ordering the approval of a water right for the Public Utility District No. 1 of Okanogan County’s (PUD) hydroelectric project. The project would divert water from a portion of the Similkameen River through a powerhouse. To satisfy the public interest requirement of RCW 90.03.290, the ROE included a condition that the PUD would be required to ensure that the mini*365mum flows in the bypass reach portion of the river would be the same as those found to be adequate to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Department of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Magdalena T. Bassett v. Washington State Department Of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In re C.V.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Mike Hamilton, V Pollution Control Hrgs BdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Center for Environmental Law & Policy v. Department of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Ctr. for Envtl. Law & Policy v. Dep't of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.