In re C.V.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, J.
¶ 1 If a person, as a result of a mental disorder, "presents a likelihood of serious harm, or is gravely disabled," the court shall order the person involuntarily detained for treatment.1 A court may dismiss a meritorious petition for involuntary commitment only if the involuntary treatment act requirements for commitment "have been totally disregarded."2 The policy underlying this heightened standard is that individuals with serious mental health issues requiring involuntary commitment for treatment should receive timely and appropriate care to safeguard the individuals themselves and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. EngelWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. EngelWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Thurston County v. Cooper Point Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Detention Of D.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- In Re The Detention Of N.G. And C.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022